Speech an the Sacred: Does the Defence of Free Speech Rest on a Mistake about Religion? by Andrew March

Speech and the Sacred: Does the Defense of free Speech
Rest on a Mistake about Religion
by Andrew March
Name of Student
Name of Institution

Guilt as a moral compass; this is more so often used by religions in determining whether or not an individual could be considered acceptable or morally proper. The capacity of speech to impose guilt is a very important factor that becomes a determinable source of tension among individuals who may think differently about religion as a moral compass. Liberal thinkers often consider religion to be a binding unit that makes a definite sense of impact on how people live their lives as they are bounded by rules [both necessary and unnecessary]. Liberalists, however, think that humans ought to live freely; using their knowledge of good and right in order to make decisions that will mark their being and the personality they present as primary foundations of their personal worth. The contemplating thoughts between these ideas with regardreligion and morality has long been a source of conflict among thinkers. This is what the article of Andrew March is all about. Trying to identify the consideration over the capacity of speech to make or break a soul, the article tries to present basic idealisms that amplify the effects of language and semantics in proving how humans make it certain that words spoken to them be a resolute source of weighing compass for the soul.
In the article, March specifically takes note of the three most influentia…