The arguments on Death Penalty
Crime is bad for any society that desires socio-economic and political development and prosperity. The objective argument in support of the death penalty is that it is the best deterrent measure against commissioning of heinous crimes (Richards and M. Dwayne 994). Despite widespread criticism that capital punishment does resolve crime, the existence of the penalty works to deter potential criminals from committing crimes (Pierce et al. 774). The criminals fear death as they know that capital penalties are irreversible once executed. Even suicide bombers would only like to die due to their courses but not face the execution.
The objective argument against death penalty relates to the costliness of the process of execution of criminals. When compared to other forms of penalty, the death penalty costs the highest amount of government money set for the American Correctional and Justice Department (Lancet 1263). A case investigation of the California justice system by the Death Penalty Information Center (DPIC) in 2008 showed that the state spent approximately $137 million annually on capital charges (Richey 1). According to the report of the DPIC revealed that sentencing offenders to life cost $11.5 million annually.
The Death Penalty Information Center (DPIC) disclosed that New York spent 170 million dollars within 9 years in conducting capital cases. This report covered the time before the repealing of the death penalty in…
Order Original Essay on the Similar TopicOrder Similar
from $10 per-page