Classifications of Life-Span Development

Critical Review of Zastrow & Kirst-Ashman Age Theory
Student
University
Critical Review of Zastrow & Kirst-Ashman Age Theory
Zastrow & Kirst-Ashman (2006) categorize young and middle adulthood based on mental actions associated with age. Individuals are classified by age due to predictable thoughts and behaviors from individuals solely based on age and life expectancy. The context of organizational systems, family structure, and community systems are correlated with biological characteristics to determine the Zastrow & Kirst-Ashman (2006) theory on age; however, Albert Bandura’s Social Learning theory can make improvements to the choices (Bandura, 2001).
The classification depicts young adults as focusing on creating identities within society, and middle adults are focused on sustaining stability within the work and family structure based on evolution. Zastrow & Kirst-Ashman (2006) classify those behaviors as common across various cultures. The responses are predictable and necessary for survival based on a person’s age (Zastrow & Kirst-Ashman, 2006). All humans will experience those theories or else he or she will not survive into adulthood according to methods of evolution. (Bandura, 2001).
The phrases used by Zastrow & Kirst-Ashman (2006) are based on biological factors to explain adulthood phases and ignore the role of society in shaping human behavior through social learning. New categories of adulthood would include sp…