You’re working on a project with another worker, and he’s not doing well. His contributions need constant correction. Does your obligation to the organization’s well-being provide ethical justification for informing superiors about the shortcomings?
In such a scenario, you are obligated to report the misdemeanors to the organization. While this might give one the feeling of betrayal, reporting a colleague to the organization is ethically justified because you are looking out for the best interests of the organization. Withholding such information will violate your contractual obligations because many people sign up to protecting the company before any other person or anything (Ferrell et al. 135). Employees are often paid to ensure that the company is able to reach its utmost goals. And by allowing underachieving workers get away with incompetence, one exposes the organization to possible failure and the inability to produce proximally. In short, it will be for your own interest, just as it is to the organization and your other fellow employees, to report such a case in order to prevent the eventual productivity issues. It is not a question of whether but that of how you should do it professionally.
Does the ethical situation change if you’re also competing with that workmate for a promotion? If it changes, how and why? If not, why not?
Yes, when fighting for promotion with a workmate the whole situation changes signi…
Free Case Study Essay Sample, Download Now
Order Original Essay on the Similar TopicGet an original paper on the same topic
from $10 per-page