Case study 1
Case Study 1
Case study 1
The change in output for the patient is of concern. The change in output urine signifies a problem with the posterior pituitary gland that may have affected the kidney so that it cannot respond to antidiuretic hormone (Ignatavicius et al., 2017). From the case study, it is evident that the patient experiences high urine output even after having a total IV intake of 1500 ml which signifies a high prevalence of diabetes insipidus. It is evident that the collecting duct together with the distal tubules of the kidney is unable to reabsorb leading to excessive urination (Ignatavicius et al., 2017).
It is advisable not to discontinue the IV and Foley catheters. This is because the patient is suffering from speed shock that is causing faster infusion of the IV intake. According to Ignatavicius et al., 2017, as the patient is suffering from kidney failure, the Foley is important to help the patient discharge urine from the bladder to prevent permanent kidney damage. Also, the surgery on the patient’s femur acts as the cause of failure to urinate without the Foley.
There are high symptoms of hypovolemic shock which the patient experiences. The patient is losing more than 20% of the body fluids as evidenced by the IV intake of 1500ml which he discharges 1800ml in three hours. There are symptoms of internal bleeding which resulted from the surgical of the fracture of the femur. The patient has low blood pressure which i…
Free Case study 1 Essay Sample, Download Now
Order Original Essay on the Similar TopicGet an original paper on the same topic
from $10 per-page