CAP 7 feedback

Student’s Name
Professor’s Name
Course Number
Date
Critically Appraised Paper Peer Rubric (CAP)
100 points
Points
Title page with the focused clinical question Provided with all information
10 points Provided however not complete
5 points Not provided
0 points The title page and the PICO question is clearly stated.
8 Points
Clinical relevance statement Clear and concise clinical bottom line from both articles.
20 points Clinical bottom line reported however not clearly stated or lacking information
15 points Clinical bottom line not stated or not clear
10 points The clinical relevance statement is provided. The article evaluates the effect of sensory-motor training to improve motor function among patients with Parkinson’s disease. The paper has a clinical bottom line although some information is missing.
15 points
Study summary Comprehensive information provided an article
30 points Most information provided on search—missing one-three items for comprehensive information
25 points Minimal information/detail on specific search
15 points The article provides exhaustive information about how Parkinson’s disease leads to sensory problems and the necessary interventions. The paper points out how occupational therapist can apply the knowledge learned in the article.
28 points
Study appraisal Identification/statement of study strengths as well as threats to validities
25 points Partial statement of study strengths and limitations for both o…