About the immigration

0 / 5. 0

About the immigration

Category: Article Review

Subcategory: Classic English Literature

Level: College

Pages: 3

Words: 825

Student’s Name
Instructor’s Name
Course Number
Date
Article Review on Immigration
Various situations lead to people immigrating. It may be due to war, political struggle, poverty, hunger or any significant or natural calamity affecting an individual nation leading to its citizens immigrating to foreign countries. However, there are immigration policies. According to The National Immigration Forum (2015), immigration policies in one way or the other affects all the aspects of the society.
Immigrants play a vital role in the life and growth of various nations involved in immigration. They contribute $10 billion annually to the United States country’s economic growth. For instance, on September 11 terrorist attacks in the U.S, immigrants have been a target of discrimination and suspicion. The article affirms further that, even if the country needs to be defended, there is a clear and vital need for equality and freedom to its citizens no matter their origin.
There were certain key principles supported in one of the leadership conference held on civil rights. A path to permanent residency was emphasized to the immigrants. The hardworking immigrants were encouraged to come out of the shadows and regularize their status. Another principle that was supported at the conference talked about a firm and fair enforcement. United State’s immigration policies need be consistent with humanitarian values and treat all individuals with respect and dignity.
Also, there was another principle that talked about the restoration of due process. According to the article, in 1996, the Congress enacted several immigration laws that rapidly affected the rights of immigrants. Immigrants who face deportation for any reason whatsoever must have the access to humane, fair and common-sense procedures. Under family reunification principle, the family-based immigration system needs to be reformed. It can frequently take years, much over ten years, for close relatives of U.S. subjects or perpetual inhabitants to get foreigner visas. This urges individuals to outstay interim permits or locate some other approach to entering the nation illicitly.
With a particular end goal to lessen excesses, any proposition ought to quit removing the visas given to quick relatives of U.S. residents from visas accessible to all family-immigrants. Consequently, this falsely discourages the quantity of permits available to other close relatives of U.S. subjects and perpetual occupants. People should likewise quit anticipating U.S. natives and lasting occupants who can bolster their families at or over the destitution level rule from rejoining with their families.
There is a meaningful way to address the future flow of workers into the U.S. Some Leadership Conference individuals trust that future work needs can be met through visitor specialist programs that incorporate relevant work Securities and furnish migrant laborers with a reasonable way to perpetual residency and citizenship. Several people argue that future streams ought to be tended to through a visitor specialist program. They trust that future laborers ought to be conceded as full accomplices into the general public and work environments through the present “green card” occupation based visa framework, as opposed to through visitor laborer projects, which they accept to be inalienable exploitative. Under either system, any plan intended to meet the demonstrated needs of businesses for new work should completely secure the privileges of both immigrant workers and in addition those officially in the U.S. A recommendation that basically powers set up laborers to leave the U.S. after a brief timeframe will just urge them to stay there illicitly.
According to the article, there were several frequently asked questions on various issues concerning immigration. Some asked whether the undocumented immigrants do receive the public benefits. The response to the question reported that the immigrants are eligible for a small minority of both the federal and state benefits. Some include the emergency care and various types of welfare. However, the health care spending for the immigrants is approximated to be half of that of citizens.
The other question asked was regarding what types of access do immigrants have to the public benefits. It was stated that immigrant’s access to government benefits relies on upon their movement status and the date of the section into the U.S. Undocumented immigrants might just acquire crisis human services and not very many different administrations. Despite the fact that settlers impart the commitment to pay assessments to local conceived Americans, their entrance to public benefits is significantly more limited.
The last question posed on what were the immigrants’ rights to “due process.” It was affirmed that while immigrants are naturally treated distinctively under the laws from United States subjects, The Leadership Conference emphatically trusted that immigrants qualified for crucial reasonableness and judgment skills from the laws that administer their affirmation and evacuation. Especially as an aftereffect of sweeping immigration reforms in 1996, in any case, immigrants are regularly subjected to self-assertive and even pitiless laws and strategies.
As an aftereffect of the 1996 laws, immigrants fleeing oppression are presently substantially more liable to be sent back by low-level immigration authorities. American families have been torn apart as legal immigrants who had minor brushes with the law years ago can be bolted up and ousted with no chance for security, restricted access to lawyers, and with no fresh opportunities.
In my opinion, the article presents the situations immigrants pass through in their foreign country especially in the U.S. The policies put across somehow act harsh according to the 1996 laws towards the immigrants. However, I see it positive if the state laws gave the immigrants equal laws and opportunities like the natives and not to treat the immigrants in a way that is not positive. I feel the article fights for the freedom and rights of the immigrants.
Works Cited
The National Immigration Forum. Why You Should Care About Immigration, (2015). Retrieved
from: http://www.civilrights.org/immigration/care.html